Herrick’s civil issue points to an ex-boyfriend given that supply of the impersonation assaults. (WIRED has opted for not to ever determine him while he’s perhaps not known as being a defendant when you look at the issue. ) He presumably started Herrick that is impersonating on also before their breakup earlier in the day in 2010, but just began making use of the spoofed records to harass him when they separated. The problem states that the ex “would manipulate the geo-physical settings” regarding the app—a simple enough hack utilizing GPS-spoofing apps for Android os or jailbroken iPhones—to make fake reports seem to be found at Herrick’s house or work.
The ex-boyfriend told WIRED in a telephone call which he denies “any and all sorts of allegations” when you look at the issue,
But declined to comment further as a result of just exactly exactly what he referred to as another case that is pending involves both him and Herrick.
Goldberg stated she had individually confirmed all of the claims when you look at the problem. “Any assault on my client’s credibility is countered because of the voluminous evidence I’ve seen, ” claims Goldberg, that has risen up to prominence as a tough advocate of victims of revenge pornography instances. Goldberg declined to generally share any one of that evidence, nevertheless, preferring to show it at a later on stage within the lawsuit. Goldberg and Herrick additionally declined to comment further from the ex-boyfriend or their involvement that is alleged in spoofing assaults, emphasizing that Grindr may be the topic of the lawsuit for enabling the spoofing no matter whom carried it away. “a user that is malicious simply operating amok employing their item as being a gun, ” claims Goldberg. “Grindr can control that, and they’re perhaps perhaps not. “